By Shadrach Aziz Kamara
The Parliamentary Oversight Committee on Transport and Aviation has submitted a detailed progress report on the ambitious Banana Island Port project, triggering not only keen interest in the project’s prospects but also a heated debate over procedural issues governing the presentation of committee findings.
On Thursday, April 10, 2025, Committee Chairman Hon. Dixon Rogers tabled the report in Parliament, summarizing developments following an oversight visit and engagement with the Gentle Group of Companies, the project developers.
The report highlights early groundwork on what is touted as a transformative national infrastructure initiative. Once completed, the Banana Island Port is expected to boost tourism, enhance maritime operations, improve connectivity, and create substantial employment opportunities, particularly for young people.
While acknowledging the progress made, the committee identified critical challenges threatening the successful completion of the project. These include unresolved government concession issues, inadequate community engagement, environmental concerns, and uncertainties surrounding financial sustainability.
“The work done so far is commendable, but there are pressing areas that must be addressed with urgency,” Hon. Rogers emphasized. “This report should be seen not only as an update but as a call to action for all stakeholders.”
However, the report’s presentation sparked a procedural standoff in Parliament. The debate shifted from the report’s content to disagreements over the proper timing and format for debating committee reports. Some MPs called for immediate deliberation, while others insisted on adherence to standard notice periods.
Speaker of Parliament Hon. Segepoh Solomon Thomas stepped in to provide clarity, affirming that the Business Committee’s role is to schedule—not reject—committee reports. “There is no room for selectivity in what reports come to the House,” he said. “We must protect the integrity of parliamentary procedure.”
Senior MPs referenced Standing Order 18(9), which requires a formal notice of motion before debating reports. Yet, several members argued that in matters of national urgency, a more flexible approach should be considered to ensure accountability and timely decision-making.
Amid the tension, a consensus began to emerge around the need for improved internal processes. Lawmakers proposed dedicating specific sittings for the tabling and debate of committee reports, backed by follow-up mechanisms to ensure implementation.
“Let us allow our committees to do their work,” one MP remarked. “When there’s a gap, leadership can intervene. But our goal should be unity and efficiency in oversight.”
The Banana Island Port report now awaits a scheduled date for formal debate. Its adoption could mark a turning point in ensuring robust oversight and project accountability. Meanwhile, Parliament is expected to review its procedural framework to facilitate a more effective and transparent handling of committee business.
