By Shadrach Aziz Kamara
Freetown, Sierra Leone – The Parliamentary Oversight Committee on Employment and Labor Security has adjourned its hearing to May 30, 2025, granting Mr. Arjan Fofanah additional time to present concrete evidence supporting his claim of wrongful dismissal from the Office of the Ombudsman.
During a session marked by order and seriousness, the committee, chaired by its head, expressed concern over Mr. Fofanah’s previous failure to submit admissible evidence. Although summaries and meeting minutes were presented in earlier sittings, the Chair emphasized that these documents do not satisfy the evidentiary standards required for parliamentary inquiry.
“We are not here to accept minutes and summaries,” the Chair stated firmly. “You were asked to bring documentary evidence showing why your dismissal was unlawful. The committee is guided by the Employment Act and national labor policies, and we expect your submissions to reflect that.”
Mr. Fofanah initially brought his complaint before Parliament on April 30, 2025, alleging unjust termination from the Ombudsman’s Office. However, the committee has insisted that any judgment or recommendation must be grounded in factual, legal documentation submitted by both parties.
The Chair reiterated the committee’s commitment to fairness, stating:
“The Ombudsman’s Office has already submitted its position, referencing applicable laws and regulations. Mr. Fofanah must now do the same.”
While the committee does not have the authority to issue binding rulings, it is expected to compile an impartial report to be presented to the Speaker of Parliament, who mandated the inquiry. Any party dissatisfied with the outcome has the right to pursue legal action in court.
Both Mr. Fofanah and representatives of the Ombudsman’s Office are expected to reappear on Friday, May 30, 2025, with relevant documentation. The session will also provide an opportunity for cross-examination.
In closing, the Chair warned all involved to respect parliamentary protocols and avoid any conduct that could amount to contempt of Parliament.
“This process must remain transparent and evidence-based. Our report will focus solely on the facts and legal frameworks presented. Until then, this House is stood down.”
