By Mohamed Kamara
The ongoing parliamentary debate over Sierra Leone’s Proportional Representation (PR) electoral system has generated widespread political discussion, with differing views emerging on the constitutional process required for its continuation or abolition ahead of the 2028 general elections.
While some political observers argue that a referendum would be necessary if the main opposition All People’s Congress (APC) fails in its bid to abolish the PR system, others maintain that the ruling Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), with a two-thirds majority in Parliament, has the constitutional authority to approve its continuation without a referendum.
Political scientist James Turay, a teacher in Freetown, said the opposition believes the continued use of the PR system limits its ability to increase its parliamentary representation through constituency-based elections. According to him, the APC maintains that the system, which was previously used under different circumstances, should not automatically become a permanent feature of Sierra Leone’s electoral process.
Mr. Turay noted that the SLPP, on the other hand, argues that the PR system offers several advantages, including eliminating the need for costly by-elections when a Member of Parliament or local councilor dies, resigns, or vacates office, thereby reducing public expenditure.
He further stated that the ruling party appears determined to maintain the system and, given its parliamentary majority, could secure the required two-thirds approval if consensus with the opposition is not reached.
According to Mr. Turay, should negotiations fail, Parliament may ultimately resolve the matter through a vote. He added that the debate is expected to extend beyond the PR system, as lawmakers consider more than 50 recommendations relating to electoral reforms proposed by the Electoral Commission.
He said the parliamentary deliberations are likely to be robust and could attract the attention of national and international stakeholders. Although the involvement of guarantors may not be constitutionally required, he believes their engagement could help ease political tensions and promote consensus during the reform process.
